Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Recently, the worth of roads and railways spark a lot of controversy issue among the expert city-designers. this essay will put forth some partial advantages to describe my affirmative opinion with extending railways.
Although roads have their merits, railways have more proprieties for countries. The more progressed country people live in, the more widespread railways they need. On the grounds following reasons:
First and foremost reason is having allover and stated of the art railways, show that country is advanced. that means governments could afford railways. Secondly, cost of roads constructions have been about two time than railways. that means governments could afford railways easier than roads. Besides not only do railways transport burdens safer, but also they make transportation much more convenient. To exemplify, the statistics of murder whom killed by car accidents are significantly more than trains. Furthermore, a few persons with a train could move over plenty of heavily burdens, but that loads are either impossible for transporting or that need tight security because of their hazards and the other limited. Thirdly trains make less contaminants fumes than cars and trucks, so roads could be more detrimental to environments and that is not acceptable for environmentalists. Fourthly, exhaustions are more in roads than railways, because of asphalt feature in facing with wide range of temperature, but rails are more persistent in facing to nature effects.
On the other hand, roads could be more contributing in some mountainous district, because the trains slip if the slope be more than a certain amount. Thus, that is impossible for designers to make it constructed, and some people’s preferences are travelling by their own cars, because of private area or personal decisions. For example, they could stop driving for rest or seeing some landscape and taking some memento pictures.
In conclusion, in my opinion, at any country people need both of the ways collateral, because of their defects which could have been completed by each other. but strengthened railway could be more effective for approaching to expanded economy. However, some countries’ in charges never find out the importance of this yet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- With the development of modern society is the less of traditional ways of life Is it important to keep our traditional ways of life How can this be achieved 83
- Being a celebrity- such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Other believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and gi 73
- With the development of modern society is the less of traditional ways of life. Is it important to keep our traditional ways of life? How can this be achieved? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... issue among the expert city-designers. this essay will put forth some partial advan...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive opinion with extending railways. Although roads have their merits, railwa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. On the grounds following reasons: First and foremost reason is having allo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ailways, show that country is advanced. that means governments could afford railways...
^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...have been about two time than railways. that means governments could afford railways...
^^^^
Line 9, column 743, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun contaminants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the other limited. Thirdly trains make less contaminants fumes than cars and trucks...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sistent in facing to nature effects. On the other hand, roads could be more c...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pe and taking some memento pictures. In conclusion, in my opinion, at any cou...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ould have been completed by each other. but strengthened railway could be more effe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00367122307 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7310832207 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.684210526 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10757768605 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421603916422 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451162550079 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589038695403 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377370179344 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.