Some people think that computer and internet are important in children study but other think students can learn effectively in schools and with teachers.
discuss both sides and give your opinion
Nowadays, with the development of technology, Internet-connected computers have been utilized in many schools. However, whether studying with such hi-tech devices or studying in traditional ways will actually be effective has caused heated debate. My view is that traditional education will be efficient methods for children.
First of all, it is obvious that students can only absorb the lessons more thoroughly and effectively when in schools and with teachers.
for most students, the advantage of classroom-based learning is to obtain necessary knowledge which will enable them enhance analysing skills and problem-solving ability. This means that most of children, after attending a school, can be communicated with teachers, who will share his or her wisdom and expertise and will encourage offspring to think critically and independently.
Moreover, traditional learning provides expensive equipment and provides practical experiences for students. For example, they can be allowed to access to chemical and laboratory needed to do experiments that online studying are limited by the technology. Therefore, it is important for children to learn at schools in order to promote themselves physical, intellectual and emotional development.
This is not to say, however, that we should neglect positive impact of remote learning. For instance, students who live in rural areas without roads or funds to pay for tuition to enroll a school far away, an internet connection solve this. There are of course, internet also is great sources of information for learners to gain their knowledge of various aspects. But still, studying at school with teachers is more effectively for most children.
In conclusion, traditional education is the best approach for a learner, helping them achieve life values. Meanwhile, we should not ignore the other important roles of studying online is undertaking.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-13 | trungtrung | 84 | view |
2018-03-17 | Happy Monga | 56 | view |
- line 11
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 67
- Many people believe that it is important to protect the environment, but they make no effort to protect it themselves.Why do you think it is the case?What actions do you think that individuals can do to protect the environment? 84
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ly when in schools and with teachers. for most students, the advantage of classro...
^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...roblem-solving ability. This means that most of children, after attending a school, can be commu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69473684211 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13347281668 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9342239072 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245373556879 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792449258798 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609466543982 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123629080628 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347289192381 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.