The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major University in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar diagram shows the gender-wise academic staff percentages across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
The percentage of female academic staff is comparatively less than the percentage of male academic staff in most of the faculties considered in the study. Fields such as arts, education, and medicine have more female staff while the remaining categories are dominated by male staff. The difference between male and female academic staff percentage is higher in engineering section, where more than 80 % of the faculties are males and less than 20 % are females. Exactly opposite train can be observed with faculties of education where nearly 80 % of the staff are females and the rest are males.
In the field of medicine, male and female staff percentage as are almost equal, nearly 50%. Although male staff percentage is higher in the departments of business, law, and science, the female staff percentage is close to 40%.
In general, the number of male employees in the academic section of various departments is more than the corresponding female employees. Women are less employed as academic staff compared to men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | Sreeveni Das | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Rising University fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 78
- if you are given an opportunity to study a subject which you have never studied, which subject will you choose? 61
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child's development. What gift would you give to help a child to develop? 56
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major University in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22702702703 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80558257261 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6326353347 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359040504329 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176236688264 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817853746848 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241026026995 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798145967143 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.