The bar graph illustrates the percentages of three different sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - contributing to the British economy in the last century.
Overall, although economy of the United Kingdom was supplied mostly by Agricultural sector during the first half of the century, it was dominated by Business and Finance sphere in the end of the period.
The least considerable proportion at the beginning of the period was for Business and Financial sector at nearly 5%, while numbers for Agriculture were slightly as many as for Manufacturing, around 49% and 45% respectively. Following this, figures for Business sector climbed considerably up to around 35% by the end of the period, whereas Manufacturing had experienced a gradual decline to a mere 10% by 1975, before dipping markedly to approximately 15% in 2000.
It is clearly seen from the graph that the most significant percentages were made up by Agriculture. In 1950 it accounted for just over one second of the total contribution; however, it fell steeply after a quarter of the century to one-tenth. Moreover, the figures for Agriculture had seen another downward trend in 2000, finishing the period by just under 5%.
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 Causes of land degradation by region 56
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994. 78
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows the world s ten most expensive countries for petrol along with other financial information Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15139724476 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1617790916 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177398613994 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895772884125 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109021682526 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13690130072 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121338256177 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.