Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Education is the building block towards the success of an individual. A student's future is based on the outcome of the courses that he has studied. Syllabus is always framed by meritorious professors keeping in mind the potential and calibre of every kid. Hence, I feel that the judgement could be given in the hands of professionals and not a naïve person. Moreover, options could be given to a graduate or the one in business school.
Further, relevance of a particular course is best understood by a teenager rather than an elementary school student. Therefore, until the school level, it could be mandatory to follow the course set up by professionals. The reason behind this is that, at the growing stage, kids must be exposed to all types of courses of their age. Only then, when they become bigger, they would understand the need and interest and choose courses favourable to them.For example, a second grader might say that, in future, he would like to become a pilot owing to the craze for flying. Similarly, a girl child might want to open a parlor as she could be interested in cosmetics. A boy child, at a very young age might aim to become a police officer looking at the heroes in his favourite movie. Thus, for a school going child, the world is a fascination and future is to dream. we cannot ask about a particular course to such a child.
On the other hand, when it comes to college level of studies, there is no harm in getting the suggestions of the student as he is the one to study it. At the same time, valuable suggestions and interests should be evoked in a student who is the best in academics and who is able to differentiate between a good course and a better one.
Adding to the above said points, we can clearly distinguish the pattern and mode of study at various stages and for many courses especially a graduate one. For instance, a mathematician may need programming capabilities to arrive at a result for his solution. In such a case, if the student is interested in pursuing a career oriented towards industry needs, then he may pursue a course in computer science, which could give him an exposure towards industrial problems. On the other hand, there are children who would have joined a particular course due to the compulsion by his parents or relatives and that he has no interest in learning. In such a case, getting the suggestions of students is a mere waste of time.
To end, we can summarize that at an early stage wherein the child us a neophyte courses could be made mandatory whereas for sophomores suggestions could be got based on their interest in a particular field of study. In both the cases, it will be better if the final decision be taken by an emeritus or a person holding greater ranks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | bmartinurcelay | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | 08sandip | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Navis | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 93
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 75
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 16
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 16
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...t and choose courses favourable to them.For example, a second grader might say that...
^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...xample, a second grader might say that, in future, he would like to become a pilot owing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 863, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...s a fascination and future is to dream. we cannot ask about a particular course to...
^^
Line 7, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns of students is a mere waste of time. To end, we can summarize that at an earl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, as for, for example, for instance, i feel, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62525458248 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70584196019 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511201629328 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8161910684 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.227272727 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3181818182 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118562881237 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331000027666 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367293346144 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710916139209 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367330300971 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.