Today the economical gap between the rich and poor is widening. What you believe are the reasons for this what can be done to prevent this from happening.
The importance of today the economical gap between the rich and poor is widening. Which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people calming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential appears to be more rational. This easy will further elaborate my views for favoring the impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant o ne steams from the fact that today widening condition very bad because poor man widening condition very bad government not think about to poor man. The rich people widening condition is best. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that government need that this problem to solve. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good bad stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint there are some more merits demerits but one of the crucial effect is that the reasons for this can be done to prevent this from happing besides today the economical gap between the rich and poor is widening. Hence it is apparent why many are against in favor of this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits drawbacks of today the economical gap between the rich and poor is widening are indexed too great dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-17 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Because of the global economic, many goods including. what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. to what extent do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage. 77
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and these is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 55
- Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily product but other country have to be transported for a long distance. to what extent do the advantages outweigh this advantage? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... between the rich and poor is widening. Which was always debatable has now become mor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...steams from the fact that today widening condition very bad because poor man wide...
^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition very bad because poor man widening condition very bad government not think ...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...between the rich and poor is widening. Hence it is apparent why many are against in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90416666667 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56010728399 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529166666667 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.6307328662 50.4703680194 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400930540008 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159781159945 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145922093493 0.071462118173 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259077080606 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119407634535 0.0609392437508 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.