Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
While in the past people have no choice except communicating each other face to face, today because of invention of internet they are able to discuss about a project or subject by sending an e-mail without seeing each other. I think that having real meeting could be more beneficial because of some reasons.
Firstly, speaking face to face would progress the project better rather than by e-mail since words cannot transfer all meanings. An important part of communicating is body language which is totally overlooked when you say your opinions by internet. For instance, writing sentences would not transfer the emotions beyond the words like when you are angry of your colleague's idea about the project.
Secondly, it would be more time-consuming process and consequently results in an unfortunate delay in project delivery. Students are not always online to read and answer e-mails immediately, and even if they were, more time should be spent writing rather than talking. So it is beneficial for the project programming and schedule to communicate in person.
But also there is advantages for using mails and other internet-based facilities. For example, in the occasion of being far away from each other, project team members could progress the project and reach a consensus without travelling long distances and charging a vast amount of money.
In conclusion, although there are positive incomes through using a modern method of communicating like electronic mail, I personally believe that still running a project through physical meetings and in person discussions would be more effective because of the significant effect of watching the acts when someone is presenting his/her idea in understanding the conception and meanings, and decreasing in the time of the project by the time saved by choosing to speak instead of writing long letters on computer or other devices.
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 94
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are advantages'?
Suggestion: there are advantages
...e to communicate in person. But also there is advantages for using mails and other internet-base...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29235880399 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82418212583 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594684385382 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.973239173 48.9658058833 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 5.45110844103 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247918989097 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991520756587 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566245888624 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136459500265 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447190482296 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.