Without a doubt, many people would believe that focus in only one proyect per time would be better when others may consider the opposite point of view. As far as I am concerned, I belong to the first group. I believe that complete a project before starting the next is the best way to work. I feel this way because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, I consider that having only one project to work with allow a deeper research and focuses to the topic by the researchers. In other words, a better quality result could come out with a team dedicated only into one big topic to develop. To illustrate this point, my personal experience is a proof of it. When I was a student in grade 12, I had to prepare a project about history in a very slim frame time. At that time, internet was not an option for research as today and I had to look for information into specialised libraries and the only way to success was cancelling all the other projects and activities I was involved in. Finally, after a lot of work and night without sleep I could finish the project successfully.
Secondly, I also believe the organization would improve considerable when working in only one project other than several at the same time. Moreover, the agenda and the workplace dedicated to the project would be more effective. For example, when I decided to work in one project everything that does not belong to that particular work is moved to other place so I can focus much better in what I am doing and study. Consequently, I get better results following this method.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that having one project per time to work with is the best way to get better results. This is because researcher can focus and research deeply in one topic and can work in a more organised way.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 90
- TOEFL Writing Practice Task Directions Give yourself 3 minutes to read the passage 7
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52870090634 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56205822532 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489425981873 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4829672459 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251059903198 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909728748339 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589194508094 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166088199612 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482340290567 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.