The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams.
Given is a line graph providing data on the amounts of gold sales in Dubai in 2002. Measures are shown in millions of dirhams.
A brief analysis of the figure reveals that while gold sales saw violent fluctuations during the given period, it remained relatively unchanged over the last three months of 2002.
Increasing marginally from 200 million dirhams in January to almost 220 million dirhams in the second month of 2002, gold sales then continued its upward tendency. It peaked in around 350 million in March. However, it plunged sharply to approximately 120 million dirhams in July.
Afterward, it experienced a period of erratic behavior prior to September, rising to just above 200 million dirhams in August and for the next month reaching the same level as in July. This was followed by a gentle climb to somewhere in the vicinity of 190 million dirhams in October before finally, gold sales leveled out in that position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-15 | appollo abu | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | appollo abu | view | |
| 2021-10-03 | Raju godara | 79 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Nikisha | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-06 | _quynktrang_ | 70 | view |
- In a world filled with significant challenges, owning pets, and especially owning costly, resource-consuming dogs, is an irresponsible use of time and money.Write a response in which you discuss how much you agree or disagree with the claim and include th 50
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 78
- Many doctors are concerned about the high use of computer games by children and young people. What mental and physical problems may arise from excessive use of these games? How could these problems be reduced? 89
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96178343949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55730699362 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643312101911 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.3955573194 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.375 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361260044475 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15057664901 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092453316191 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225713656487 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11663671761 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.