The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Given is a bar chart comparing the rates of money donation given by different ages of British community members to a charity in 1990 and 2010.
A brief analysis of the graph reveals that in 1990 people under the age of 50 contributed more money than that age in 2010. The pattern was converse for people over 50 comparing 1990 and 2010.
In 1990, nearly 40% of British people who belonged to the third age group (36-50) donated money to charity, where the contribution of them in 2010 saw a slight reduction to around 35%. 51-65 years old people listed in the second place of the year 1990, donating the same percentages of 36-50 years-old in 2010. However, there was a gradual rise to just under 40% of those donors in 2010.
Approximately 31% over the age of 65 and 30% from 26-35 years-old people contributed money in 1990 although the rates for the former climbed to 35% and for the latter dropped to slightly less than one-quarter in 2010. Moreover, around 15% of 18-25 years-old youngsters were responsible for donations in 1990. Nonetheless, the percentage of them plunged considerably to a mere 7% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 73
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible arguments on both sides and say which side you personally support 57
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life especially for families What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside for example as farmers What is your own view about this 95
- Pollution of rivers, lakes, and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment. What are the possible cause of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, third, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72448979592 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60667854007 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.334482745 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369310183418 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161778601383 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616190037995 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244173970706 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00685260463684 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.