In recent years, due to stiff competition in almost every area, most of the people are in an opinion that competitive sports have positive impact on children. However, some of them disagree with the above notion. Before presenting my views, I would like to explore both sides of the argument.
Competitive sports offer many advantages like they make the children survive in present society that thrives on competition. Competitive sports provide some challenges that help the children deal with such challenges in life. Moreover, the competitive sports make the children imbibe the discipline and hard working nature and also helps them to build confidence.
On the other hand, opponents of competitive sports argue that these sports are detrimental to child’s mental health. If these sports are played at win-at-all cost attitude, some unethical means are adopted by the children to win the game at any cost. Competitive sports also have some toxic effect on relationship among children. Each child may refer others as his rival to his own success and may envy at other child’s success and laugh at his failures.
I feel that, competitive sports good but over competitiveness should not be encouraged. The win- at-all cost should not be adopted by the children. Children should be practised by elders from their younger age in competitive sports and the aim of the child should be playing rather than winning.
Competitive sports have many pros and cons. Students should take part in competitive sports because they help the children to adapt to the competitive society. The educational institutions should discourage any unethical things adopted by the children and thus it would result in a very good positive effect on the child.
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 56
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- heating fuel choice according to year of construction 53
- participation of 5-14 year old in leisure activities (Australia) 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24911032028 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77612006558 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540925266904 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3206208647 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279640887589 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103837160564 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500632185354 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160846771542 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324757098738 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.