Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason
The advancements in every field is not hidden. The immense development and understanding encountered within past few decades is commendable. The curiosity among scientists to explore new areas and finding answers to the enigma has lead to the great discoveries, which are gifts to the world. The recommendation presents a view that I would partially agree with the statement that Scientist and other researchers should focus their research area that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Statistics of the research publications and the advancements provides evidence that researchers and scientists are devoting considerable time in their field of study. Some researches gain extreme publicity due to their high impact on the populace and some due to their rare discoveries. It is important for a scientist to focus their work for the benefit of the society so that maximum number of people can be advantaged from it. For example, medical researchers should be focussed trying to eliminate perilous diseases like HIV, AIDS , cancer which contributes to the mortality rate considerably. They should be far more focused in unleashing the latent answers for the recent diseases ,rather than focusing on other subareas like more advancement in already present surgical techniques. This area requires more focused research rather than distorted aim. But every area of studies is not the same, plainly considering the known cases and their effects on the population can thwart the chances of discovering new connections among the various fields
It is also of paramount importance not to think of affecting the population only. Research is meant to find answers to the various observations, some are meant to affect the mobile while some does not. But such researches sometimes lead to the other discoveries which can help to effect the people in large number. For example, formulation of various robust machine learning algorithms has lead to the revolution in the computer aided applications. Artificial Intelligence is the future of the world, its various applications proves how well this field can be meticulously extrapolated to find optimal solutions for the problems existent in nature. Some algorithms are capable of diagnosing the diseases at earlier stages and precisely which even medical professionals are not capable of. So if scientists would have not focused on this area, there would have been no such solutions.
Research should be focused to find novel links and answers to the most grief problem of the society. Research should not be bounded but it should be focussed more in discoverig something which can influence the mob.s
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
2019-08-22 | Nikita Goel | 66 | view |
2019-06-15 | SOUMEDHIK | 83 | view |
2019-06-02 | dsbp15 | 66 | view |
2019-05-26 | fa1salahm3d | 58 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention to problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 70
- Issue 4: Claim: Goverment must ensure that their major cities must receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 83
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention to problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...within past few decades is commendable. The curiosity among scientists to explore n...
^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...coveries, which are gifts to the world. The recommendation presents a view that I w...
^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iminate perilous diseases like HIV, AIDS , cancer which contributes to the mortali...
^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e latent answers for the recent diseases ,rather than focusing on other subareas l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3325415677 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92284241691 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520190023753 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.233245189 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.157894737 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26315789474 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31361843923 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992844423743 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105387925884 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216626800609 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918299884231 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.