Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
The author states that scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that would benefit the greatest number of people. Though it is a very strong argument, I think scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that would benefit any number of people, because each and every people are equally important. Moreover, if scientists and other researchers focus only on the areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people, new problems may never get solved.
First, each and every people are equally important. While an issue may affect a small number of people at first, it might affect a lot more people eventually. For example, there are a small number of people who are affected by cancer compared to the whole population of the earth. But if scientists and other researchers do not focus their research to cure and prevent cancer, the patients might die from it. Furthermore, though today the number of cancer patient are small, in future it might effect a lot more people.
Second, new problems may not be solved if scientists and other researchers focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. For example, most of the people of the world have smartphone today. But some of the people in Africa and Asia are deprived of this technology. If scientists and researchers do not find a way to produce cheap smartphone, they might never get a chance to use that technology.
Some may argue that if scientists and other researchers do not focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people, scientists and other researchers may not get funding for their research. This argument is flawed because funding for research does not depend only on the number of benefited people, but also the impact of the research.
In conclusion, scientists and other researchers have obligations to make the world a better place while giving importance to each and every life. Moreover, they should try to solve new problems even if it matters to only a limited number of people. For these reasons, scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that would benefit any number of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Nikita Goel | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | SOUMEDHIK | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | dsbp15 | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | fa1salahm3d | 58 | view |
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 50
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 26
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ly important. While an issue may affect a small number of people at first, it might affect a lot ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ople eventually. For example, there are a small number of people who are affected by cancer compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 494, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...r patient are small, in future it might effect a lot more people. Second, new proble...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...of the world have smartphone today. But some of the people in Africa and Asia are deprived ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...nce to use that technology. Some may argue that if scientists and other researcher...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56966339246 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.360962566845 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7707143251 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.352941176 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386529721228 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167833058976 0.0831039109588 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152099706336 0.0758088955206 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283677269856 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107841747337 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.