To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
To be an effective leader, one must maintain some important qualities. Hard work, self-motivation, honesty and ability to work in a team are few of them. I believe a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards to be an effective leader along with hard work, self-motivation and being a team player.
Recently in Bangladesh, a girl was physically tortured. After the torture, she went to the nearest police station and informed the police officer. But instead of filing a case and take legal actions, the police officer mocked the girl and sent her home. Two days later, the girl was found dead in her room. It was a suicide. If the police officer maintained his ethical and moral standards and did his job, an innocent life won't be lost and the criminal would be brought to the justice. So, if a leader does not maintain his ethical values, it becomes a serious issue for the organization as well as the country.
Second, a public official must have courage and self-motivation to become a true leader. For example, last year Bangladesh suffered from a serious cyclone. Because of the cyclone, a lot of people who lived in remote area were confined to their home. Many public officers along with others volunteers from different organizations went there and rescued them to nearest safe haven. In this case, if the officers and others volunteers didn't have the courage and motivation to rescue them, something unwanted would happen to those poor people.
In conclusion, though a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards to be an effective leader, it is not the only quality to look for. Hard work, self-motivation, honesty and ability to work in a team are very important as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | NobodyUp | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | roy.suro | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | seonjungkim | 62 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | gaurang.rane | 33 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 58
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of 63
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 26
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the exposure problems of the future. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain you 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the nearest'.
Suggestion: to the nearest
...ganizations went there and rescued them to nearest safe haven. In this case, if the office...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SAFE_HAVEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'haven'.
Suggestion: haven
... went there and rescued them to nearest safe haven. In this case, if the officers and othe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., if the officers and others volunteers didnt have the courage and motivation to resc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90169491525 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76071675908 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528813559322 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7915200344 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0588235294 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23251037347 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748350271377 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113306947117 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162866435546 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913900330987 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.