The graph shows the hours spent in different study methods during a two years course.
The line graph illustrates the number of weekly hours spent on three study methods: studying in library; with a tutor or lecturer and using the Internet during a two-year course.
At the first sight, we can see from the graph that studying by internet has dramatic increase in number of hours while the time in class with lecturers declined and time in library varied.
The most striking trend is that the hours of studying by internet increased significantly during 4 semesters of 2 years, especially between the first and second semester of each year. The figures grown from the beginning about 3 hours to over 10 by the end. By contrast, the hours spent on studying in class room or lecture situation decreased continually. The amount of time in this category was initially the highest at approximately 7 hours a week, but then the figure fell down during second year to finish at 5 hours.
Time in the library fluctuated throughout the period. It initially decreased from 4 to 3 hours after a semester of first year, then increased rapidly to 8 hours before once again declining to 6 hours at the end.
- The table gives information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cities in the same week in May 2017 74
- Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits, and TV channels.Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? 67
- Water is natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Home schooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in the modern society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80829015544 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63232833447 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3175851467 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322766707485 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142607881042 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113689778837 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216781128059 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120866454461 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.