Summarize the points made in the lecture about dinosaur fossils found, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the passage about findings on fossil bones.
The reading discusses the evidences found in newly discovered dinosaur. However, the professor in the lecture refutes these finding and provides three reasons to support his point of view about each finding mentioned in the reading.
First, the passage talks about the tiny channels, that it attributes them to blood vessels areas. But, the professor indicates that they may actually be originated from some other living creatures inside the fossil remaining. For example, he thinks that they can be the bacteria lived inside these hollow places after the dinosaur's death and their soft residues kept intact behind a layer of mineral during this amount of period.
Second, the article mentions the spherical materials discovered by microscopic study which it thinks to be red blood cells of the enormous animal. In contrary, professor in the lecture opposes with this agenda and he specultes that these things may be the remaining of reddish minerals gathered inside the animal's body cavities.
Third, the reading introduces finding of collagen in the dinosaur's leg bone. On the other hand, He illustrates that if these materials actually be collagen, they must be deteriorated by this time, since the collagen's life cycles are mostly about 100000 years. However, these substances were found in fossil remaining with far older ages near 7 million years when no collagen can be salvagable. He believes that these things may be the skin remaining of scientists probably attached to the bone.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture about dinosaur fossils found, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the passage about findings on fossil bones. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web sites. Use specific reasons and example 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ed inside these hollow places after the dinosaurs death and their soft residues kept inta...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f mineral during this amount of period. Second, the article mentions the spheric...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 208, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'collagens'' or 'collagen's'?
Suggestion: collagens'; collagen's
...be deteriorated by this time, since the collagens life cycles are mostly about 100000 yea...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29707112971 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52787543878 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606694560669 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6418876049 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.090909091 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205752616953 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762099882369 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396190791028 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125445043786 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519671204309 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.