People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
One's handle over emotional drive is considered to be a good trait when it comes to decision making. Of course this varies largely on the type of decision in question largely, but objective decision making keeping logic first is indeed preferred in professional spaces.
It goes without saying that making judgement calls in a professional setting needs to be done with logical reasoning. The simple reason would be that it is important to prioritize the business's or institution's well being over a sentimental client situation. Decisions that are made based on emotions can largely hard the business because from the institutional perspective, it might not be a good decision at all, even if the decision, for example, saves a family from financial misery. Coming up with logic to back up the emotional decision already made doesn't help the business lot and sometimes, may cause more harm than good.
On the other hand, decisions in one's personal life need to be handled with a proper amalgamation of sentiments and logic. A poor decision maker in this case would be a person who fails to see the reasoning case by case. When deciding who to date or which food to have for dinner, surely emotion driven decisions are better than logic driven ones. Yet, some sort of logical explanation needs to be there before the decision is made, for instance, the cost of Chinese versus Indian food for dinner. Yet, once the decision has been made, say emotionally, finding logic to back it up is a way of making yourself feel better and there is no harm in that.
Generally, it is customary to see emotions and logic as two sides of the same coin and more often than not, one is expected to make the right call. However, the idea of a right call is often subjective and largely vague. So is the question of being a good or bad decision maker. Prioritizing either over the other and then using the other to justify the decision is just one's way of making themselves feel better. Objective decision making surely depends on a lot of factors and there is no way of defining someone as good or poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society 66
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 69
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 66
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
...dgement calls in a professional setting needs to be done with logical reasoning. The ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... up the emotional decision already made doesnt help the business lot and sometimes, ma...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 33, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d. On the other hand, decisions in ones personal life need to be handled with a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, for instance, of course, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7472826087 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57681922953 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524456521739 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2760838351 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1875 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422751525598 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14653389477 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775040109921 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279412421422 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308936000687 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.