Local residents today pay less attention to the local museums as well as ancient heritages while foreign visiters is the main income of these place. There are some causes of this neglect of local people and some methods could be proposed to spark interest in museum visit.
Many reasons are attributed to the rarity of local people visit. Firstly, the budget spending on operating the museums was being cut in recent years which leads to escalate the ticket fee. The price of ticket is prohibitively high that overwhelms the average income and going to an exhibition could be considered catering for wealthy class. For example, an exhibition demonstrating the historical leftovers from Vietnamese war may sound gripping to some history students but the ticket fee deter them from enjoying these values. On top of that, people of modern era are overloaded by unprecedented choices of entertainment like amusement park, cinema, entertaining complex. As a result, hardly do people opt museum as an amusing spot. For instance, a family could go to the restaurant or cinema instead of paying visit to museums. To sum up, the relatively high expense and abundance choices of entertainment may the reasons of separating the local visiters from this worthy place.
Several actions could be taken to increase the figure of local visiters. The first solution is to raise funding for the museum in order to remain the diversity of the exhibitions in addition to lowering the cost to enter the museum. Manifold individuals and organizations may enthusiastic with maintaining the ancient values and due to that they would prefer to invest in museums operation. Apart from that, the primary, secondary or high school should promt students interest in discovering the history of nation through lectures and visit to historical places such as museums or ancient sites. Holding vacation in museums also help young children understand the knowledge thoroughly and long lasting. Finally, the museums curators could promote some advertising programs to draw attention from the public. For example, on the independent day, some exhibition with regard to war or soldiers could stimulate many people interest, therefore, convince them to go there to search for companionship.
In conclusion, local people rarely go to museums or historical sites compared to the number of overseas traveller; however, solutions like funding, education, and advertisement could be implied to enhance the amount of local visiters
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Many people had been involved in sports as children but don t do any physical exercise as adults What are the reasons people avoid physical exercise How to overcome this trend and motivate to be more physically active 72
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 73
- All education, primary, secondary, and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Many people had been involved in sports as children, but don’t do any physical exercise as adults. What are the reasons people avoid physical exercise? How to overcome this trend and motivate to be more physically active? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed to spark interest in museum visit. Many reasons are attributed to the rarit...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o enhance the amount of local visiters
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, with regard to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33670886076 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8156519974 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549367088608 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0300993717 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2222222222 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317729988659 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105698043687 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935447271553 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2391262396 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079009606661 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.