tpo52
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views on the possibility of colonization on the asteroid. While the passage lists three reasons to rear the feasibility of this colonization; the professor, otherwise, considers them impractical and mentions each reason's downsides.
First of all, the article referred to the low gravity on the asteroid as an advantage which makes a landing in and taking off easy; on the other hand, the lecturer refutes this advantage by mentioning other side-effects of low gravity. As he explains, the low gravity causes severe health issues such as the reduction of muscle mass and bone density in a few months. By the settlement for a longer period, these health issues are inevitable and can threaten people's life. Therefore, the low gravity has a major impact on the health which outweighs its benefits.
Secondly, the text stated that the availability of valuable metals in asteroids can be profitable for people by mining and exporting them to earth. On the contrary, the instructor rejects this reason too. According to his assertation, the excavation and exporting of metal to earth is costly which reduces the number of profits. Furthermore, there is no warranty the price of these metal will remain the same; especially be the increment of their availabilities, their marketing price will be declined. Thus, the mining valuable metals cannot be a cogent reason for colonization on asteroids.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage highlighted the close distance between the asteroids and earth as another clue; the professor, on the other hand, denies this reason too. Based on his description, although asteroids are close to earth during the getting to them, they possess unusual reaction and moves away. So, during the getting back period, there are not as close to the earth as they were previously. Even there is the possibility that they get as far as Mars, in this condition, the returning will not be as simple as assumed. Consequently, the considered convenience of transportation between the asteroids and Earth is not valid.
- tpo48 80
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alig 83
- 23.1 tpo 80
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- 1.In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the stateme 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20771513353 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89992213349 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0312383829 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6875 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.