The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph represents how many men and women completed their university education between 1992 and 2007.
Overall, women accounted for the majority of people who left university with a degree within this period. Moreover, the rate of growth for the number of female university graduates outstripped that of male university graduates.
For women, there was an upward trend in the number of university graduates. More specifically, from 1992 to 1994, an increasing number of women obtained a university degree, from less than 100 thousand to approximately 103 thousand people, but the period from 1994 to 1997 observed a slump to the mark of 100 thousand. Since 1997, however, a rise in the number of women graduating from university occurred, which resulted in an 50% increase to around 150 thousand graduates.
As for the number of male university graduates, there was also overall growth. Going into more detail, the first three years of the overall period saw a slight bump in the number of men completing a university degree, from 70 thousand to 73 thousand, but then the figures experienced a slight decrease until 1988, when 70 thousand men received a university degree. The next three years saw erratic change around mark of 71 thousand male university graduates in the figures, yet, from 2001 onwards, the number of male university graduates rose consistently, ultimately reaching about 95 thousand people by the end of the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 73 | view |
2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 92 | view |
2023-03-31 | thucuc | 55 | view |
2021-09-14 | changdaynek | 73 | view |
2021-08-29 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1996 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 69
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below gives information about the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012 2014 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts give data on the proportion of time and the places people of different age groups in the country of Fantasia spend and go for information on a weekly basis. 73
- The government should sometimes infringe on people s freedom for the security of society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2170212766 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79373936307 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4367125106 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.222222222 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191282503317 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990074927566 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340542194325 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129838874529 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136485017083 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.