Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? Agree or disagree?
Nowadays, considerable number of people are inclined towards experimental learning as compare to conventional method of formal education, which has attracted myriads of controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be agreed that students can reap more benefits through experimental learning, while on the other hand stands a perspective that gives detrimental effects to non-educated people. This essay will elucidate on both sides and thus will lead to plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why experimental learning is more advantageous in formal education and the most conspicuous stems from the fact that because it allows students to understand and grasp new ideas in a more detailed manner. For an illustration, a student will better understand the ideas of physics and mathematics through experimental elaborations despite of theoretical learning. Moreover, it helps in developing cognitive skills in students that certainly help them developing strong formal education base, yet it is a necessity of today's fast growing world. Hence, there is no reason to why one should not adhere experience during formal learning.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks for the detrimental effects to non-experienced educated. It demotivates students during their crucial time of career that causes stress too. As an illustration, being in competitive job market, non-experienced students have less weight-age as compare to experienced ones. A recent survey shows 30% students get their job because of their experience during studies. As a matter of fact, non-experienced students face challenge in job market that causes serious problem to society as well.
In light of discussion above, it can be concluded that experimental learning has countless benefits towards job-security and prestige in society, although the way it effects non-experienced students should not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 70
- The Space travel is fantastic these days and people are more fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmetal issue 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? Agree or disagree? 85
- Effective learning requires time, peace and comfort, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic. Support your opinion with examples. 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ls in students that certainly help them developing strong formal education base, yet it is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7212543554 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23278107954 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4601760473 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.307692308 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18795847308 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590352443488 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616118814859 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118535059312 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697340468294 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.