Men and women due to the differences in their physical strengths are supposed to carry different tasks.
The statement is quite precise and to the point. It says that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks because of their inherent physical differences. I strongly agree with the statement though and elaborate explanation would be required for this position. Men and women are born with inherent differences which are not only physical but also biological, emotional and mental. The world has mistaken the word equality with what is best suitable for a particular gender. This has to be clear that by supporting the statement, in no way, is unjust to the women or denial to the rights of the women. This is not about the who is superior or powerful, it is rather focussed about the tasks best suited for a particular gender's health and their wellbeing.
Men are born with natural strength and are more equipped to take up muscular tasks and endure pain. Whereas, women are born with natural beauty and charm which has to be cherished. They are the flowers of a family. There is absolutely no point in comparing men and women according to their strengths and trying to be ahead of each other. There has to be a reason why they are born with different inherent characteristics, and it is hence vital for one to understand that both of the creatures are bestowed with different innate features.
Let's take up and example. If all the women and men started to work in a factory, the overall balance of the world would be degraded and hence would be harmful to not only the people in that area but also for the coming generations. Suppose a child is brilliant in studies and is a born genius and then there is another child who is born with great reflexes and would go on to become a great boxer. It would absolutely be ridiculous if the child with great mental capacity is forced to pursue a career in boxing or the child who is born with great reflexes is forced to study science and invent something. Likewise, women are born with delicacy and are supposed to be taken care of. This should be mistaken for diminishing the status of women, they can well be great leaders, scientist, and philosophers. But, the arduous tasks which require physical strength and endurance is better left for the male counterpart to be taken care by.
Comparing the physical strength of men and women would force the women to work as hard as men and would eventually harm their physical health. In the current world, a sense of comparison has prevailed and is destroying the innate qualities that men and women are born with, as they are not supposed to be compared but rather cherished and appreciated. This is, by no means, intended to degrade the status of women or show that men are superior but rather to accept the fact that both are born different for a reason. Scientists have proven that women have higher mental retaining power than men whereas men are more physically strong. It reinforces the fact that each of the men and women has disparate qualities and should be acknowledged for a better living.
In a nutshell, men and women are born with different physical strengths to carry out different tasks and hence should never be compared rather should be equally respected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | maaz abdul moiz | 66 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 58
- Men and women due to the differences in their physical strengths are supposed to carry different tasks. 66
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimalrole in private business matters. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...as mistaken the word equality with what is best suitable for a particular gender. This ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...d with different innate features. Lets take up and example. If all the women a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, likewise, so, then, well, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 51.0 19.5258426966 261% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2633.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71863799283 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54503822931 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403225806452 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1674954527 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.32 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.32 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.48 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291578165455 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949400399119 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906625505713 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219664305799 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934398502171 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.