In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Over the course of our long history, we humans have made significant contributions across various disciplines. Some of them have been a minor tweak or an advancement of an earlier finding while some have been brilliant imaginative never thought of ideas. The statement mentions that all significant contributions have been heavily influenced by past achievements in that field. While it is possible and is often the case that a significant achievement or a break through in a certain attempt has been influenced from past achievements in that field, one cannot rule out a original idea totally unrelated to past achievements. There have been multiple instances, where we humans have made significant strides by inventing new theories or products nobody ever thought of before.
Isaac Newton, for example began formulating hi laws of motion without any reference to a previous achievement. His contribution and findings arose from a commonplace observation of an apple falling on his head. This is a simple phenomenon that nobody before him cared to even think about. His imagination and the curiosity behind the reason why the apply fell on his head rather than go onto any other direction gave rise to the phenomenon of “Gravity” as we know it today. Of course, many scientist have later worked on top of his theory supporting it or going against it.
Delving into history, the theory of evolution coined by the famous Charles Darwin was another example, He toyed with a seemingly non-existent observation of the characteristics of Green peas and saw how they responded to certain experiments that he conducted on them and came up with the theory. This again demonstrates his curiosity and his passion to explain how evolution of various species was related to their genes.
We can travel for long distances in a very short amount today due to the invention of the airplane by the Wright brothers. The only precursory thought that they had before gambling on the idea of a flying machine was the flight of the birds. Nobody, before them had the audacity to imagine humans flying. They failed in may of their attempts. They almost went bankrupt in their attempts to create a working model of their airplane, but they never gave up on their idea. The belief that they had in their idea was based on no former obserbation or contribution, but simply their willingness to creating something truly remarkable.
That being said, we also have seen cases in history where a significant contribution which has alleviated today’s world, inspired from an idea envisioned by somebody before them. The models of atom that we learn today in history books has been credited to John Dalton and other scientist today. But the inspiration for that modesl was based on the work that scientist like Henry Rutherford and Neils Bohr worked on.
Similarly, Henry Ford who I credited with the idea of creating a Production line and reducing the cost of making a car borrowed the idea by observing Slaughter houses in Europe.
As a summary, while it is entirely possible that significant contributions in today’s world are made from previous achievements, humanity has shown it is completely capable to create inventions that never existed before. Previous events or achivements certainly aid in creating a thought for the future, but they are not the cornerstone to truly remarkable achievements. They are merely a aid for something to be achieved. Imagination, perseverance and the willingness to be tenacious enough to see our vision come to fruition is what makes an idea successful above anything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 62
- TPO5People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. 73
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 42
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperaturesconstant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, nomatter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs were 73
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 572, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ents in that field, one cannot rule out a original idea totally unrelated to past...
^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...and the curiosity behind the reason why the apply fell on his head rather than go onto an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...y' as we know it today. Of course, many scientist have later worked on top of his theory ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 393, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...emarkable achievements. They are merely a aid for something to be achieved. Imagi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, similarly, so, while, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 58.6224719101 164% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3035.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13536379019 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97230939268 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 308.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521150592217 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 957.6 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3940624313 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.730769231 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7307692308 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138655529653 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392881597982 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725847519268 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557518433243 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061860138339 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.