The bar graphs below compares number of men and women opting for full-tie and part-time higher education in Britain in three periods: 1970/71, 1980/81, 1990/91.
Overall, number of men pursuing full-time education decrease over the given period. While, that of women increased significantly. Part-tie education showed a much similar trend in both genders and it increased over the years.
In early years of 1970/71 women opting for full-time education was comparatively lower (around 700) than men (1000). This was equalized as number of women preferring full-time higher education rose by 100 and that of men reduced by 200; to give a figure of 800. However, in the final year this flipped, with women being at the position where men started (1000) and men maintaining the fall at just over 800.
The rate of enrolling for part-time education by males increased slowly over the years with 100 at the beginning to 200 in the final year. Whereas, a significant hike in number of opposite gender was encountered with a rise of approximately 200 from 0. thus, diminishing the gap between two.
- The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason behind this? Is this a negative or positive development? 84
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all time, even on holidays, Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ucation decrease over the given period. While, that of women increased significantly....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the beginning to 200 in the final year. Whereas, a significant hike in number of opposi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ith a rise of approximately 200 from 0. thus, diminishing the gap between two.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07222222222 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70492805865 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7754949686 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285958157209 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117677085209 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852640216482 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189652897496 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685436017091 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.