The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the USA and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
This graph displays the change in rate of jobless people in USA and Japan within March 1993 and March 1999.
Overall, US started with a higher rate of unemployment than Japan, but as years pass employment increases. On the other hand, Japan’s shiftless people start increasing but at a slower rate. The point at which the graph ends the US has decreased and Japan has increased, but at close points.
To begin with, US had a rate slightly lower than one-tenth. Then, at a somehow fast rate unemployment decreased to approximately one-twentieth in March 1995. Next, the rate reached a plateau which lasted for two years, and some fluctuations started to occur in March 1996. Subsequently, the rate keeps on falling till ending at a rate somewhat lower that one-twentieth.
Moving on, Japan started off in 1993 with a rate kind of higher than one-hundredth. Gradually, Japan’s progress kept on growing till coming to a notch lower than one-twentieth in March 1996. Afterwards, the rate attained a position where it is steady till around March 1998. Following, a faster increase in pace has been noticed till stopping at approximately one-twentieth.
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the U.S between 1988 and 2000. 73
- For some people the ideal holiday is to get away from their normal routineby staying in a hotel or camping in a countryside Others prefer to stay at home and do things they do not normally have time for What do you think are the benefits of going away on 92
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the U.S between 1988 and 2000. 56
- Some people think that developed countries have higher responsibilities to compact climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment 73
- In education and employment, some people work harder than others. Why do some people work harder? Is it always a good thing to work hard? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pan within March 1993 and March 1999. Overall, US started with a higher rate o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n has increased, but at close points. To begin with, US had a rate slightly lo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te somewhat lower that one-twentieth. Moving on, Japan started off in 1993 wit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13684210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03919000727 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.6505593371 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329437522878 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135421226658 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121055919637 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253278983171 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146221639364 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.