Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
It is the fact that the development of technology nowadays has altered the way that people communicate with each other. In my opinion, this trend is positive thanks to the benefits which have brought to human life.
It is clear that the improvement of technology, or specifically, the presence of the internet, would bring about many advantages regarding individuals. Firstly, people can easily contact each other wherever they are with the help of smartphones connected with the internet. For example, students living far from home could make a video call with their parents at a minimum cost. Secondly, technology has significantly affected the relationships of people around the world. It means that a friend living in China could make a friend with a friend living in the UK without traveling, which will help them to train foreign languages in the most effective way.
Turning to another perspective, there are also many benefits that governments could gain due to this development. One evident strength is that governments may be received comments from citizens more directly by using emails or websites, in other words, this would lead to the overall improvement of the government’s officials. Another advantage mentioned here is the boost of culture interchange due to frequent interaction between people in different countries. Finally, many aspects such as economics and society may be obviously enhanced from one country to another country because government leaders can easily contact each other.
In conclusion, the development of technology shows a positive side. This trend could bring out many crucial values with respects to individuals as well as governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 82
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39772727273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97660760556 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4268643472 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.615384615 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342252169627 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11666228648 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986659577997 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202246379565 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779059344432 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.