Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Some people claim that traffic growth and pollution problems could be tackled by increasing the petrol cost. While I agree with this solution, I believe that others are still useful and that dealing with the price of petrol is not the best one.
For a variety of reasons, the cost of fuel could affect growing traffic and pollution of the environment. First, since people must pay a lot for petrol, they might tend to use public transport instead of traveling by their private vehicles. This means that the number of traffic vehicles could be reduced, which leads to a decrease in gas emissions. Second, by introducing a higher price on fuels, humans may limit their daily commune. In fact, people are more likely to travel when they do not have to think about the cost of moving, which conducts more traffic vehicles on the roads and therefore has a negative impact on the environment.
In my opinion, there are some solutions to the hurdles of growing traffic and polluted environment. One effective way is that governments should significantly invest in the public transport system, which could bring the public a sense of convenient and pricy. This would directly impact on the way people traveling and thence traffic growth could be reduced. Besides, it is necessary to develop some strategies to encourage people to use cleaner fuels for their cars/motorbikes instead of conventional fuels. In fact, many do not want to use cleaner fuels since they might think that it could not produce energy as good as conventional petrol. It means that the authorities should focus on how to demonstrate the effectiveness of green petrol, which could minimize the toxic gases exhausting to the environment.
In conclusion, I believe that there are many ways to solve the growing traffic as well as environmental pollution. In my point of view, rising the price of petrol is a noticeable way but it is not the best way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92901234568 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70984666313 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6005625829 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229787905671 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824788313848 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450041369117 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161450964635 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325854838827 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.