Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measure do you think might be effective?
The issue of addressing the climbing traffic and contamination problems had become a pressing issue. Despite the arguments of some people that pushing the price of car fuel is the most effective way to tackle this issue, it is my personal belief that these problems can hardly be dealt with by this measure. Two principal reasons for this are as follows.
For a start, the root of the increasing number of cars and pollution problems is not about the economical factor. The one who uses the car on the road had sufficient wealth to afford the price of petrol. Rising the price of fuel is useless for interrupting them to continue driving by their own car. In addition, it is undeniable that adding the price can reduce the cars but this way just barely lower a few cars owned by individual drivers, nonetheless, the commercial needs for transportation cannot be eliminated. Even though the price of petrol increases, they have no other choices to use.
Confronted with such a thorny issue, people come up with a variety of constructive countermeasures. First of all, the government should bear the brunt of this issue by promoting the public awareness. Enhancing the citizens consciousness of using public transportation rather than cars through education, advertisement or other paths is an effective to eradicate the fundamental problem of growing traffic and contamination. Moreover, the law department can enforce stricter laws of the manipulation of the quality of petrol. some kinds of the fuel that release more poisonous substances should be banned in order to mitigate the pollution problems.
By and large it is generally believed that without immediate and effective solutions, the problem of reckless environmental harms and the burden of traffic system will undoubtedly deteriorate. it is hence high time for government specifically to take the initiative before it gets worse. As it should be, ordinary citizens like us need to make concerted efforts too.
- Topic Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 82
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities study. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 78
- With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be. 84
- The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ing the public awareness. Enhancing the citizens consciousness of using public transport...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 526, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... manipulation of the quality of petrol. some kinds of the fuel that release more poi...
^^^^
Line 13, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ic system will undoubtedly deteriorate. it is hence high time for government speci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, in addition, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19314641745 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00350949442 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591900311526 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4023276061 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133422793207 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404285409846 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030172459646 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759783769282 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223365735836 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.