Professor in the lecture questions the public or TV appearance of university professors lately. She rejects the idea in the passage, that these showings are benfitting to university, public or to the person himself/herself.
First, she states that TV appearances do not enhance the stature of a professor, not at least professionally. Instead, she says they are considered frivolous acts in the education society. Doing these, a professor is usually dropped from invitations to important conferances or they don't get funds for research activities.
Second, she mentions it's a waste of time as a professor. Showing up on TV, will require an individual to prepare for the presentation or in dressing up for the show. This time wasted, compromises the efforts, which should have been on University,'s research activities or academic programs. So, it doesn't helps the university as well.
Thirdly, argument in the passage for the public benefit, doesn't convince her. She says, public do not require any technical or detailed insights from a professor, instead people are just interested in the topic or some brief content. This level of analysis, a non-academic person with some effort ca present. Public don't need any heavy technical content to understand when they are watching TV after a whole day struggle.
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 66
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 58
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ations to important conferances or they dont get funds for research activities. S...
^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rch activities. Second, she mentions its a waste of time as a professor. Showing...
^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...ts, which should have been on University,s research activities or academic program...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...activities or academic programs. So, it doesnt helps the university as well. Third...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... in the passage for the public benefit, doesnt convince her. She says, public do not r...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...son with some effort ca present. Public dont need any heavy technical content to und...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, third, thirdly, well, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3014354067 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05571232404 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0734956221 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2307692308 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0769230769 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12278966566 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466992729889 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493974872034 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812391070281 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366575833478 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.