The author argues that governments should address current issues in advance rather than future problems. While it is plausible in some cases, it may not always be the case.
The author argues that governments should address current issues in advance rather than future problems. While it is plausible in some cases, it may not always be the case.
Admittedly, immediate problems are more important than future ones because it can threaten the stability of the society. Any outbreak of epidemic diseases such as the SARS and Ebola virus can seriously risk people's lives. However, thanks to the appropriate governmental effort with medical support, the recent outbreak of Ebola virus has been controlled successfully saving thousands of lives. Accordingly, focusing on solving immediate problems is more reasonable.
Nevertheless, future problems cannot be overlooked by governments because they can grow into serious problems if not dealt with. For instance, the recent global warming and sea level rise warn of potential disasters to our environment. Thus, to prevent the society from occurring the disasters in future, countries ratify Kyoto Protocol and commit to reducing the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Therefore, governments should not only focus on immediate problems.
Furthermore, future problems and current problems are not mutually exclusive. Both are closely intertwined. For instance, Human Genome project completed to decode all genes in human body, which enables the progress of medicine and other health science to solve current unknown human diseases. However, this project also raises serious possible ethical issues; people with genetic problems could be discriminated by employer. Thus, government should consider both current and future problems at the same time.
All in all, it is not denying that solving current and immediate issues are important. It seems more reasonable that immediate and future issues should have equal attention by governments and sometimes both problems are closely related thus address them at the same time.
- What would you change to improve your health?1. Food quality2. The amount of exercise in your life3. The amount of stress in your life 76
- great nation 50
- A lot of high school students now cheat in homework assignments, by asking other students for answers. Which of the following do you think is the most efficient way to stop? -asking parents to help stop the students from cheating -penalty or pun 70
- The author argues that governments should address current issues in advance rather than future problems. While it is plausible in some cases, it may not always be the case. 50
- A lot of high school students now cheat in homework assignments by asking other students for answers Which of the following do you think is the most efficient way to stop asking parents to help stop the students from cheating penalty or punishment to the 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he society from occurring the disasters in future, countries ratify Kyoto Protocol and co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 16, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... at the same time. All in all, it is not denying that solving current and immediate issu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71527777778 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7116944066 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3901198035 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8235294118 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330531050137 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115763639912 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179642153838 0.0758088955206 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276712743942 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.363815337893 0.0667264976115 545% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.