university
The author argues that university should require all students to take courses outside of their major. While the author’s assertion may be supported in certain cases, this may not always be the case.
Admittedly, taking courses from other fields can be beneficial to students under certain circumstances. By studying a variety of courses students can study their own majors more effectively with different perspectives from other disciplines. Take the students majoring in economics as examples. By taking courses in international studies, Economics majors can have a deep understanding of successful trade policies between nations, which is the fundamental concept in economics. Moreover, in today’s fast-evolving and competitive job market, students who have a diverse set of skills can gain a competitive edge. Through courses on foreign language such as Chinese, Economics students can also develop the ability to communicate in a second language which is becoming imperative in the increasingly integrated global business community. As the examples clearly illustrate, taking courses from outside can help students to study their own majors more effectively and to be more competitive job applicants.
Despite the above discussion, not all students should be forced to take courses outside of their field of study. Making such policy mandatory might result in undesirable setbacks. First, additional courses could mean an increase in tuition because most tuition is usually based on a per-unit fee. Some students have student loans to pay off their tuition. If they required to take courses outside their major, tuition may rise which may become a financial burden. Students who are pressured by mounting debt may get distracted and even lose motivation to study hard. Second, not all students benefit from studying subjects from disparate fields. For example, student-athlete who have short career spans they should focus on their training rather than take courses that do not help them improve their record.
Based on the above discussion, there is no denying the fact that having extensive knowledge is beneficial to university students. However, not all students benefit from taking courses that are not related to their major. Thus, it seems adequate that university should give students the option to select courses they wish to study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-14 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-05-09 | batterylow_123 | 30 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | LauraTing | 54 | view |
- What would you change to improve your health?1. Food quality2. The amount of exercise in your life3. The amount of stress in your life 76
- university 75
- great nation 50
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 63
- bicycle 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...pay off their tuition. If they required to take courses outside their major, tuition ma...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53314917127 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85878504503 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533149171271 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6476589978 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.15 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0648448464953 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310352734071 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738952590192 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886379732389 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955647936606 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.