Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
As education has becoming more and more important to get a higher job in order to gain a lot of money, many people argue that students who get the entrance into university but cannot afford enough money should be offered by the government the tuition to study freely. Although it is helpful to relieve the burden on these students as well as encourage them to study further, I disagree with such statement based on several reasons.
In theory, it is a good advocate to let students go to university without paying money. Not only is it beneficial for the justice in the city, but also it can help those students who devote themselves in academy while are lack of money. However, there are still have some regulation for them, such as providing loan without interest. So there are may substitution for them to take besides freely going to university.
The reasons why I disagree on the statement are as follows.First of all, when cutting the expense on the poor family to support a student to go to the university, at the same time, the action exacerbate the taxers' burden in the whole society. Once the government has to take a majority of fund form the public finance, there will be insufficient money for protecting the environment, improving the technology and medicine. In that case, citizens have to provide more money for the government to make up the lack of fund. Although some people will argue the students who go to the university freely may make more money as a return to the country. It makes sense despite the long time to wait for them to make money and the possibility that they may end up failure.
Another reason is that some people may cheat on the free regulation which the poor students don't have the opportunity to enjoy. What's more, it is quite hard for the government officers to distinguish who is truly matching the condition while don't have enough money. Also, the action may lead to corruption. For example, if parents give money less than the tuition directly to the officers in charge of picking students. Apparently, they can afford the tuition, but they just don't want to.
In conclusion, I disagree with the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | s.sim | 62 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 70
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 66
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...lack of money. However, there are still have some regulation for them, such as provi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...isagree on the statement are as follows.First of all, when cutting the expense on the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...free regulation which the poor students dont have the opportunity to enjoy. Whats mo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...nts dont have the opportunity to enjoy. Whats more, it is quite hard for the governme...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o is truly matching the condition while dont have enough money. Also, the action may...
^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y can afford the tuition, but they just dont want to. In conclusion, I disagree w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75531914894 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60573157296 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507978723404 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8595819412 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190779656974 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593085134289 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456042456603 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100821151494 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539897161678 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.