The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who
visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four
different tourist attractions in Brighton between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage visiting the Pier and the Pavilion
increased over the period, while the proportion of visitors to the other
attractions fell.
In 1980, only 10% of tourists to England went to Brighton Pier. Despite some
minor fluctuations, this figure rose from about 12% in 2000 to 22% in 2010.
The percentage visiting the Pavilion also increased,from 23% in 1980 to almost 50% in 1995.However, this figure then declined, to 35% in 2000 and then to
about 30% in 2010, slightly higher than the Festival.
The most popular Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was the
Festival. Although 30% of these attended the Festival in 1980, by 2010 this
percentage had fallen slightly to 28%.In 1980, the figure for visitors to the Art
Gallery was 21%. It rose to a peakof 38%, but this then decreased dramatically
to less than 10% in 2010. It was, therefore, the least popular of the attractions at
the end of the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Trần Thị Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart illustrates the proportio...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to four Brighton's attractions. Overall, the percentage of visiting to t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proportion of other attractions fell. In 1980, only 10% of tourists to England...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...%, slightly higher than the Festival. The most popular Brighton's attract...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05911330049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01065431574 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4235910442 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3636363636 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121125902043 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516050124507 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462561133041 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822556243313 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025919448947 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.