Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the
societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of
corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Corporations must promote their own profits above societal good and environmental well-being in running themselves. While people arguing that societal good and well-being is the most important for a corporation might sound altruistic, they inevitable come across as naive and ignorant of the workings of most corporations in real world.
There are two kinds corporations in real society. One is a profit based entrepreneurship and the other is a social entrepreneurship. Most social corporations work to solve societal and environmental problems at the expense of personal profit. While the regular corporations may or may not work for societal and environmental good at the cost of their profit they may even cause harm to the society and environment. As a result some people might argue that all corporations must work similar or close to how social corporations operate. Adopting this strategy might not be sustainable in either short-term nor long-term for all companies. Considering an example from my own life; where my relative's company which produces carry bags was fairly successful before it changes its priorities from profit to environmental well-being. It was trying to be more eco-friendly than sustainable for the company by stopping producing plastic bags instead producing jute bags. The result was retailers were not ready to buy these jute bags and the company suffered heavy losses leading to its shutdown.
Another point to address is the fact that some companies thrive by exploiting the loop holes in society which the same corporation also has a moral responsibility to correct. For example, a pharma corporation must promote its self-care among customers encouraging prevention of disease over cure. But when a pharma company does this, it inevitably in the long run falls into loss and becomes unsustainable. So arguing that all companies must promote societal good is being unfair to some corporations. It is acceptable to argue that all companies must try their best to be environmentally friendly and socially more responsible but to place these responsiblities above their own sustainable profits is being short-sighted.
In conclusion, companies can try to be as socially and environmentally responsible as possible but it would be foolish to suggest that all companies must adopt society and environment first and profit next approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Chiragzeel | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | mussob34 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | cr7 | 33 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | cr7 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concludedfrom his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village ra 50
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 65
- Tusk University should build a new recreational facility, bothto attract new students and to better serve the needs of ourcurrent student body. Tusk projects that enrollment willdouble over the next 10 years, based on current trends. Thenew student body i 42
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to dowith the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his orher inherent skills and abilities. 50
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People toooften cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking andacting because they enjoy feeling comfortable and fear theunknown 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44864864865 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23083776085 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521621621622 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5472232889 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.588235294 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173302293793 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06059172567 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432883317688 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121869611359 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026107086188 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.