Politicians are more responsible for the protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The extent of environmental degradation has sparked outrage around the world, and opinions differ whether individuals or civic authorities should be held accountable for this damage. I believe that the primary onus of environment preservation is on selected political leaders, however, the role of general public cannot be neglected.
To start with, the environmental imbalance is a widespread issue, therefore to combat this issue government has a larger role to play. This is because selected civic anarchies have an abundance of resources to resolve this ecological destruction. For instance, presently many governments are imposing ban on fuel consuming motor vehicles to restrict the unprecedented carbon emission which is highly responsible for increasing global heat. Apart from this, these legislators can execute several environmental protection laws in order to mitigate a plethora of ecological disorders such as excessive plastic usage, contamination of natural water resources. Hence, the major responsibility of environment safety lies with politicians.
Nevertheless, Inspite of multiple efforts from government to preserve natural ambiance of the earth, the individual accountability of public cannot be ignored. The reason behind this is If people at ground level will not support and collaborate with civil laws than it might be impossible for government to protect the environment damage. This can be experienced in Kenya, where despite the governmental ban on plastic polythenes, people are using them extensively, which is causing several ecological issues such as air pollution, and death of marine wildlife due to the consumption of plastic waste. Therefore, individuals have a vital role to play in the rehabilitation of damaging environment.
In conclusion, I consider that to ameliorate the unprecedented environment destruction both government and public have indispensable part to perform , whereas, government being a powerful agency can tackle this issue on broader scales.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-30 | nkp007 | 67 | view |
| 2017-10-26 | sherin rijo | 61 | view |
| 2017-08-29 | RSudhir | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-29 | RSudhir | 61 | view |
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. What do you think is the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- In many countries new houses are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about them 81
- With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- During a recent plane journey, you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested that you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants.write a letter to this businessman, In your letter 87
- The rise of convenience food has helped people keep up with the speed of a modern lifestyle. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...political leaders, however, the role of general public cannot be neglected. To start with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ublic have indispensable part to perform , whereas, government being a powerful ag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86394557823 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30490916526 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62925170068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9662317257 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101902824575 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402871013744 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044741763497 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620176323529 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221387517567 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.