The reading passage and the lecture are both about a discovery at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. More specifically, the writer discusses a silver coin which explores there does not have historical value. Nevertheless, the lecturer in the listening passage disagrees. He believes that there are some firm witnesses to prove the historical value of these coins and provide some evidence to refute all mentioned disagreements in the passage.
First of all, the author begins by stating that the area which this coin has been probed, it has a considerable distance from the Norse settlements who were some European explorers traveled this place via the Atlantic Ocean. The lecturer, however, disagrees. He declares that these people already had come from a far distance, and so it was not rare for them to take a long journey to obtain objects.
Furthermore, the author claims that the second vague is regarding the issue that any other coins have been discovered there yet. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer's argument. The speaker holds that these American settlements lived there permanently, and it was possible to bring some coins with themselves and left just once there.
Lastly, the article mentioned that the silver coins do not possess any particular value in North American as long as they did not even count them as cash. In turn, the professor in the listening passage is doubtful that this is accurate. He states that the Norse individuals may have attracted for the beauty of silver coins; therefore, they were exerting it as a commercial commodity.
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 81
- TPO 45: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO 46 Integrated Writing Task 45
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ecturer believes there are flaws in the writers argument. The speaker holds that these ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0479704797 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6967379421 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.175903597 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42480046801 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116464820587 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837055518893 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233162774422 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272192937672 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.