Producing clean energy is an impossible goal. Instead, we need to focus on reducing energy consumption.
How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with justifications and examples.
Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed but it can be transferred from one form to another. All forms of life need energy in different forms. I agree with the above statement that it is impossible to produce clean energy. Although impossible, research always continues for making anything impossible to possible. In the mean time, we should concentrate on reducing energy consumption. I will discuss ways by which energy can be consumed in the following two paragraphs.
Energy from fossil fuels is used to run vehicles. Nowadays though electric vehicles and bio-gas are gaining importance, it is definitely impossible to replace fossil fuel overnight. It is the smoke that arises from this form of energy that is responsible for pollution which in turn leads to global warming and depletion of the ozone layer. This type of energy consumption can be reduced by being less vehicle dependent, using bicycles, and walking to nearby places.
Other forms of energy used are electric energy, chemical energy, solar energy, etc. All these forms also must be used with energy consumption in mind. For example, one can consume electric energy by switching off lights and fans when not in use, switch off the main circuit of all electric appliances when not in use, switch to LED lights which consumes very little energy, not use much decorative lights in shops, etc. Every household must have a mini solar plant as an alternate source of energy instead of UPS.
Thus, I conclude by saying that it is the sole responsibility of every individual to use energy like water and money, that is, be stringent in its use, nothing wrong. For this, our future generations must be taught in their childhood itself to consume less energy and to preserve energy, thereby helping our future world also enjoy the resources we enjoyed. For the well-being of our future generations, individuals and government must work hands-on together to preserve energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
- Nowadays people are increasingly dependent on their smart phones Is this a positive trend what are the advantages or disadvantagesof this dependency Support with examples from your own experience or observations 78
- Children have responsibility to take care of their old family members but some people say that old people should not need to live with their families What is your opinion 47
- You have recently bought some furniture It was broken when you received it Write a complaint letter to the store manager and say What and when did you buy Why was it broken Suggest how the problem could be solved 57
- about wave energy machine 67
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent.Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent.Give reasons for your answer and include any relev 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'cans'.
Suggestion: cans
Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed but...
^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing off lights and fans when not in use, switch off the main circuit of all elect...
^^
Line 7, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k hands-on together to preserve energy.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 321.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07165109034 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65141063552 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563862928349 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.217218116 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7647058824 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 7.25397266985 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 6.9802955665 229% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201739624917 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840577018376 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723468360618 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130030258078 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06681142392 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.