Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Current world of advancement and technology would have been unfathomable even a devade ago and in this era of vast connectivity and rapid data procurement, this argument is but a fair one. I, for one, disagree with the argument and feel that even with the grey areas of the technology and its effect on humans it certainly does not impede or deteriorate human thinking process. it can be very intuitive to feel that if we give up on raw calculation tasks we will tend to get out of practice, or if we rely on it for storing necessary data then our memory deteriorate. but, our brain being a very dynamic organ is able to keep up with the changes in which it process information. always optimizing for the maximum output possible for a given task given the circumstances.
When we talk about our reliance on technology it is widespread and it has become so integral to us that talking about removing it is laughable. From, automated cloting lines to smartphones technology aids us in all kinds of ways. Main pattern being in it helping us do mundane repeated task like sawing or sewing or paining getting automated, or helping reduce out dependency on calculations, which was the reason of inception of computers.
these technologies aid us in growing rather than impeding our brain where we can learn and devote our time on ideas and tasks requiring higher cognitive power and abstraction that technology still cannot replicate. For example, researchers do not have to worry about simulating weather models anymore in complex numerical computation languages and can instead focus on coming up with better theory to explain and undrstand weather patterns. this helps us grow our resources and undserstanding and in no way does it effect our decision making. On the other heand we can always train out brain to learn these computations again if necessary.
another reason one might see the technology as destructive is that it interferes with our lifes on a scale we have never seen before. people's attention span are getting smaller than ever and are getting hooked to technology and use it as an escape from but that in no sense alter a human's capability for decision making but is a reflection to the destructive habit one can fall in which can be only partially attributed to technology but becomes a debate on ethincs and habits altogether.
memory is another aspect that technology affects for humans, but there has been multiple studies where they show how brain has evolved to make a co-existence with these technologies for faster data procurement where instead of raw data the brain remembers the refrences to the source of the data. this, can act as an auxiallary memory and knowledge bank to our brain making us much more capable than ever. Obviusly there are a few downsides to it, for example not being able to remember the contacts or even names of people but that does not have any consequence to decision making unless it is based on data which is not readily available.
In conclusion, I would say beside some on the falling points of over dependence on technology it has potential to make us more than our brain is capable of and moving ahead if we are better able to help ourself with using it effectively, the more we can benefit from it. technology is a very integral part of our lives and instead of deteriorating our decision making thought process it helps us by providing us better resources from everywhere and faster computation than ever.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... or deteriorate human thinking process. it can be very intuitive to feel that if w...
^^
Line 7, column 569, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ssary data then our memory deteriorate. but, our brain being a very dynamic organ i...
^^^
Line 7, column 659, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'processes'?
Suggestion: processes
...to keep up with the changes in which it process information. always optimizing for the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 680, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Always
...hanges in which it process information. always optimizing for the maximum output possi...
^^^^^^
Line 27, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... inception of computers. these technologies aid us in growing rather t...
^^^^^
Line 27, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...explain and undrstand weather patterns. this helps us grow our resources and undsers...
^^^^
Line 37, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...ions again if necessary. another reason one might see the technology as ...
^^^^^^^
Line 37, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Peoples
...s on a scale we have never seen before. peoples attention span are getting smaller than...
^^^^^^^
Line 37, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...scape from but that in no sense alter a humans capability for decision making but is a...
^^^^^^
Line 47, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Memory
...cs and habits altogether. memory is another aspect that technology affec...
^^^^^^
Line 47, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he refrences to the source of the data. this, can act as an auxiallary memory and kn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2963.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 597.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96314907873 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77294771829 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490787269682 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 942.3 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8585156391 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.947368421 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4210526316 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0551097482152 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200290965221 0.0831039109588 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.018636858973 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0343455247352 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147771990834 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.