The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
In this society, there are many elements that yield understanding of contemporary culture. Some people think that analyzing the trends of youth is the most effective method to understand contemporary culture. Nevertheless, I believe that analyzing the youth is not the most effective way to understand current culture.
Admittedly, analyzing the youth trends can help to know contemporary cultures. This is because young children tend to adapt new knowledge without any biased sight. Young people have little experience than older people, so they adsorb surrounding environment including contemporary cultures. For example, neologism made by youth can reflect the contemporary culture. As electrical devices and online network have developed, children who are adopted fast to those invention communicate each other using the devices. Then, they created new neologism in their web world to communicate. One of the most important property of the neologism is abbreviated word. This feature is caused by contemporary value, convenience and effectiveness. Since these values reflect the cultures of these days, this neologism was also spred out to older people. Thus, contemporary culture can be investigated by analyzing its youth.
However, examining youth trend may not be the most effective way to understand contemporary cultures. Since the culture created by youth usually change rapidly and disappear well, the deep analyzing of elders is needed to understand culture. To be specific, art movement cannot be constructed and changed by youth. The movement can be generated and developed by elders who are matured in their own professions. For example, Pablo Picasso created and improved Cubism. However, even though he was a genius, he could not create Cubism when he was a child. After he grew up, he can generate Cubism with his solid background on art. In addition, those deep and huge culture trend cannot be generated with only one person. Not only Picasso, but also his colleagues who are famous artists influenced to establish Cubism. Thus, contemporary cultures cannot be characterized by analyzing only youth.
Furthermore, studying youth trend is not the best way, just one way, to study contemporary cultures. There are more effective ways such as investigating successful people. Celebrities who are already succeeded using their experience and ability knows contemporary trend and culture. For instance, Steve Jobs, the past CEO of Apple, knew what people want and influenced. He grasped people’s needs on flip phone and he made smartphone which achieved functional development and trendy design. In addition, based on the deep understanding of contemporary culture, he tried to lead new culture trend for next generation. Later, new devices on Apple becomes new trend, although customers did not like the new one at first. Therefore, by investigating celebrities, contemporary culture can be recognized.
In summary, analyzing youth trend cannot be the most effective method to grasp contemporary culture. In complex society, various factors can influence on the culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | million_Z | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | jackpark33 | 50 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | pillaivishnu | 50 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | oindranil | 66 | view |
- Your recent article on corporate downsizing in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship, often for years, before finding other suitable employment. But this claim 50
- Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile 77
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this invention' or 'those inventions'?
Suggestion: this invention; those inventions
...loped, children who are adopted fast to those invention communicate each other using the device...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2648.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59830866808 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00943038475 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501057082452 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2628095833 60.3974514979 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2424242424 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69696969697 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473203567255 0.243740707755 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130824371203 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149192430874 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308145997876 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101692212316 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.