Nowadays, people can easily get information about any particular subject by searching on the media such as TV, newspaper, and Internet. However, some individuals claim that released information through the media is less trustworthy than before, which may cause critical issues in communities, for the media pay less attention to the accuracy of news. Although I admit that incorrect data may mislead societies, I completely believe that today, social media pay more attention to the accuracy of news and support my idea in the following sentences.
To begin with, as the required technology to follow news by the media was both in infancy and expensive in the past, the media reporters could not easily reach to reliable news. There was no advanced technology for reporters to search everywhere, conveniently. Therefore, local people rumored news most of the time, which sometimes had an irreparable impact on the public. On the other hand, nowadays, the technology has considerably boosted and affordable as most of the well-known media networks hired advanced reporters to gain the most accurate data of an issue to decline the probable mistakes, which may have negative influences on communities.
Moreover, people had less knowledge and literacy than now, which made them believe and trust the reported news easily. People used to ask each other or searching on limited media to find useful information, while nowadays, individuals have access to different media networks which help them to find accurate information. Also, as the portion of literacy has risen keenly, especially in the last decade, reporters have to work harder to get people’s trust and tempt them to believe the revealed information.
All in all, there are several conspicuous reasons which can be persuasive enough to accept that the media are more concerned than before to release accurate news, namely increasing the accessibility of proper technologies and the rate of knowledgeable people. Therefore, it helps them to capture people’s attention to the correct information which is beneficial for society.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school. 73
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 60
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...ccess to different media networks which help them to find accurate information. Also, as the port...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41768292683 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93053468442 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4666927974 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.083333333 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273149780537 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101193214774 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683041153984 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163054414796 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951906487445 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.