Modern technology has a great impact on our environment.Some say that people should adapt a simpler way of life style to solve this problem,while others argue the technology itself should provide a solution.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Of late, there is drastic increase in global temperature which is mainly attributed to the advancement in technology. This advancement in turn creates environmental issues such as melting down of glaciers and rise in water level. In order to evade this problem some people recommend to bring back the older times and others argue to find solutions by technology. In my view, I support people who opt for technology to overcome the problems associated in climate change.
On the one hand, incorporating simpler life by avoiding technology will reduce the carbon foot prints along with adding many advantages of leading healthier and stress less life. For instance, we can avoid vehicles for short distance travel or go for public transport for long distances which improves the quality of air. Detoxing the mobile phones enables people to cook their own food as there are no apps available for ordering food. Food prepared in home kitchen is healthier compared to the one ordered online and reduces the possibility of people getting obese. Moreover, usage of manual mixer grinding techniques to crash coconut in making curry or chutney burn calories which is equal to hitting gym for half hour.
On the other hand, technology can be used to solve the problems of global warming. As per the research conducted in USA the innovation of cellular meat can reduce the killing of innocent animals for food. This research can reduce the emission of carbon dioxide which is responsible for rise in global temperature. Usage of more and more non-conventional energy system such as wind and solar power for production of electricity will help to solve environmental issues. Major innovations such as electric vehicles can help to reduce the emission of noxious toxins into surroundings and reduce the problems such as asthma.
In conclusion, adapting a life style which is similar to older times is impossible as modern technology can be used to solve all the problems associated with rise in temperature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | Santhosh Mankala | 84 | view |
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•Explain the reasons for the noise•Apologise•Describe what action you take. 73
- Some People say that now we can see films our phones or tablets. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in theater. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 78
- Some People say that now we can see films our phones or tablets. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in theatre. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•Explain the reasons for the noise•Apologise•Describe what action you take. 73
- In order to study at universities students are required to pay expensive tuition fees. Not al students can afford them, so some people think that university education should be free for everyone.Do you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend bringing'.
Suggestion: recommend bringing
...order to evade this problem some people recommend to bring back the older times and others argue t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16513761468 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7789332576 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4378516525 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152755899636 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568686182017 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595085106581 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112393117115 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506445992324 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.