The topic is regarding the role of individuals in managing their society. The query is about, whether people should oblige only to just laws and disobey others, or accept what they are getting. I support people should raise objections to what they consider as wrong, but that objection has to be in certain limits.
First reason, why am I inclined towards promoting citizens to object is, because of the necessary change in rules with time. Every law, made by our administrators, needs to be monitored for any alteration required, to maintain the viability of that particular one. For example, in my country, India, there is a law on reservation for socially backward castes in various fields like representation in parliament, seats in educational institutions, work areas, etc. This law was passed when India, after independence from the British people, in the mid 20th century, was in a horrible state, especially in terms of racism. To improve this state, we needed this change. However, now that state has changed. People from the backward castes as well, have gained a higher status in society by getting proper education and opportunities. This situation demands people's resistance to continue this law, based on caste, as it's no longer fruitful for the upliftment of the weaker section, the reason it was implemented. Although politicians or elected leaders have this duty, but they are afraid of losing their vote bank.
Secondly, the resistance towards unfavorable rules will provide robustness in our system of law. For instance, in a country like India, where we have a wide variety of people living, there are lots of continuous amendments possible to build a constitution, that would treat each community alike. Take the case of marriage. In our country, it's illegal to have two wives. But, since people from the Muslim community has some holy thing, which allows a man to have multiple wives. So, for this, our constitution does exempt people of this religion from that specific law. This exception happened because of the followers of that religion, who protested against the law of single marriage. These exceptions and amendments will help in maintaining faith among all the communities in our national administration.
In addition to the benefits mentioned above, some issues need consideration which can challenge our position, to support rebel against improper rules. Firstly, by saying every individual should start protesting against any government, he didn't like, doesn't make sense. It's hard to determine the justifiability of any rule. Some rules, made for adverse situation of any section, could be having a limiting effect on other groups. Lawmaking requires rigorous analysis and should be finalized, based on the most benefiting resolution for the society as a whole.
Also, frequent resistance and disobedience, in a violent manner, will never lead to stable management. An administration cannot rule over a community where each individual is ready to threaten the authority, in case any order goes beyond his/her liking. In conclusion, I would state objecting to unseemly rules is justified if this objection is well analyzed and also performed through civilized channels. Every individual's problem or complaint shouldn't be allowed to hamper the peacefully working system unless all decent ways have been tried out, and the requested change is crucial for a society.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 90
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 60
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 39
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t protesting against any government, he didnt like, doesnt make sense. Its hard to de...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... against any government, he didnt like, doesnt make sense. Its hard to determine the j...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a violent manner" with adverb for "violent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., frequent resistance and disobedience, in a violent manner, will never lead to stable management. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ormed through civilized channels. Every individuals problem or complaint shouldnt be allowe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... Every individuals problem or complaint shouldnt be allowed to hamper the peacefully wor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2859.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26519337017 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86206450519 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589318600368 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9350987122 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5862068966 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.724137931 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130087428262 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316479892784 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365549673262 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729515255087 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190572351449 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 100.480337079 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.