The world usually interacts with only the major cities of a country and maintains economic ties with these prime areas. Hence, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that, the most important characteristics of a society can be studied by observing the lifestyle followed by the people in these major cities. However, some aspects of a society is also derived from the rural parts of the country.
Let’s take the first example of Beijing in China. This city has grown rapidly over the past few years in terms of technological and economic advancements. The people working in Beijing naturally depict the common features found in the people of China. They are hard-working and earn money by usually working in big production factories. The majority of the people working in Beijing are Chinese and one can hardly find immigrants in Beijing. This represents the lack of diversification across the country. Beijing is home to a number of headquarters of large multinational corporations and hence represents the economic importance of China across the globe. Therefore, Beijing acts as a connection from China to the rest of the world and the world judges the characteristics of China by studying the people living in Beijing.
Besides, let us consider Bangalore, which is one of the major four metropolitan cities in India. The diversification of people living in Bangalore is huge and people from various parts of the country settle in Bangalore because of favorable weather conditions and good employment opportunities. Simply by observing the people living here, one can estimate the diversity of people living across different parts of India. The middle class society of the people living in Bangalore is also a representation of the economic condition of India which consists majorly of middle-class or lower middle-class income people. Moreover, if we consider the rate at which the city is developing, it strongly indicates the growth of India at the global level. Hence, this example again proves the representation of country by observing one of its major cities.
Alternatively, when we look at the rural population of India, we will find that, the majority of people living in India are dependent on agriculture as their major occupation. More than 40% of the people living in India are living in rural areas and hence, this fact provides an insight regarding the drawbacks of considering only the major cities to evaluate the society.
All in all, we can conclude that, though, major cities provide us with an abundance of knowledge regarding the characteristics of a society, one should also consider the people living in the provincial parts of the country to obtain a complete picture of the country.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 59
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 23
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16742081448 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99430265089 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447963800905 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.249788732 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113419405896 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388382191611 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362061839312 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711752999473 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270270929526 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.