Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

The government is for the people, by the people and from the people. We entrust our leaders to do what’s just and best for our society as a whole. It is no surprise, that when the budget for the consecutive year is presented, apex members of any sector is pays a behemoth interest on it – they define the functioning of the system for the next year or years. The prompt suggests that the government should focus on immediate problem resolution rather than focusing on the future problems, I mostly agree with this point. The above is because of three reasons.

In developing countries today, the problem of electricity, water scarcity, healthcare services are absent, thus we need to focus on it for ensuring a better functioning society. In many remote places such as Rajasthan in India, there is a huge problem of electricity and poor healthcare services. In many cases due to elevated temperatures of above forty-five degrees Celsius, many infants get the catalyst effects from it and as a result it leads in nose bleeds, fainting, heavy fevers, etc. and due to insufficient healthcare services many infants become pray to these inhospitable conditions and eventually die. The situation exacerbates as the water supply is relatively low when compared with other states. Due to low access to water, many housewives travel a long distance to get a good chunk of water for their family survival – they cannot merely just buy water from the vendors, as they are focusing on practicing reverse redlining; price of good quality water is very high, which cannot be afforded by majority in the poverty region – and the water quality is often low. The above example demonstrates that the government should focus on today’s problem rather than focusing on the future, as the growth of society remains in the hands of proper functioning individuals, and if we cannot provide them life surviving facilities, the question of how economic growth will happen remains a conundrum – as people will be focusing on getting these facilities rather can contributing to the society as a whole. Thus, the government must ensure that today’s problems such as electricity, water and better healthcare be available to the remote locations so that our society can grow as a whole.

In many developed countries today, the quality resources available are constrained. The so called “Quality Life” implies that we have access to better quality: roads, transportation services, rail connectivity and retirement. In many countries even today, the so called quality life is missing. For instance, Mumbai is a metropolitan city, many individuals across the country and the globe come here for lucrative business or job perspective, the tourism itself is very high. But, however, there is a lot of problem with the number of trains – it will be evident to a person when they get an opportunity to travel in a local train, the local trains are overflowing with people and what’s concerning more is that the fatality rates are increases of these travelers. Moreover, the other factors such as retirement also directs people to abscond from the country, as the current retirement plans do not attract more individuals to continue. Thus, the government should focus on today’s issue at hand before moving onto next big thing.

As we are progressing into the future generation, the current job perspective will not sustain. It can be evident from the history; that the “current trend” perishes quickly in the near future. For instance “Mining” was at boom forty years ago the trainings and teachings of it were highly effective and this attracted many people because of lucrative job perspectives, however over the next few years the field didn’t receive a great deal of lucid attractions, thus as a result the people moved to different field. The government had to make a lot of changes to ensure that the people were qualified for this change. For instance, computer science was miniscule about forty years ago, whereas its eminence is echoed throughout our daily lives today. The introduction of the above field led to introduction of new technologies, new working styles which were absent before its presence – individuals working on pen, paper faced a lot of problem when initial database directed systems were introduced, many switched jobs, the computer based approaches required a prerequisite training which were given by many government institution freely. Thus, the above example illustrates that the government should look out for the future problems as well.

However, one can argue that the future perspective is needed to ensure better quality and job perspectives for the youth. But, perhaps the economy will function a lot better if a way can be derived to attain both of these at the same. Thus, the society as a whole will prosper. The question which raises is whether we can sustain the future growth with these new technological innovations? The historic evidence seems to champion it.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-19 jason123 50 view
2020-01-18 Himanshu Sharma 66 view
2019-12-30 PFF TAHSAN 50 view
2019-12-26 tg763622253 58 view
2019-12-06 sudesh tiwari 58 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ectricity and poor healthcare services. In many cases due to elevated temperatures...
^^
Line 7, column 511, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...lf is very high. But, however, there is a lot of problem with the number of trains – it will be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 953, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...individuals working on pen, paper faced a lot of problem when initial database directed systems ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4242.0 2235.4752809 190% => OK
No of words: 823.0 442.535393258 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15431348724 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.35611581051 4.55969084622 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88791198619 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 380.0 215.323595506 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461725394897 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1338.3 704.065955056 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 23.0 4.99550561798 460% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.006414474 60.3974514979 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5625 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.71875 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170580450371 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469358191614 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755363276109 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981567639488 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609422811757 0.0667264976115 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 205.0 100.480337079 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.