People used to be limited in the choice for lifelong partners but currently transnational marriage has become ubiquitous around the world. It triggers some deprecating comments against this brand new form of marriage. From my perspective, the criticism is unfounded and both the couple and their children can benefit a lot from it.
Admittedly, some opponents may defend their ideas by proposing the problems during the marriage for the sake of the potential cultural shock. However, a man and a woman can hardly get married without understanding and love to each other and these two essential factors, as the precondition for a marriage, are the best tools to minimize the possible conflicts that the husbands and wives from distinctive cultural backgrounds may encounter. When the couple have already foreseen the misunderstanding or controversies in their marriage and think it acceptable from the very beginning, there is little likelihood for them to enter the church and promised to love and care each other before God.
Additionally, the whole family may have more possibilities for their future life. Either part in an international marriage has the freedom to become the citizen in his or her partner’s country on account of the present acts for citizenship in most countries. Resources including job opportunities, medical care or other social welfare then become easily available to the young couples. Besides, children are naturally born in a bi-cultural background, which helps to cultivate their language abilities and flexible thinking habits.
In conclusion, transnational marriage should not be regarded as a cursed one which brings sorrow and harm. As long as this couple is married in the name of love, the whole family will be benefited rather than suffer from the marriage.
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To be a successful person one must open up to new ideas and willing to change his or her mind 80
- The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary and some people think is essential for daily life. Discuss both view and give your own opinions. 84
- An increasing number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34736842105 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01600531973 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0160363188 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10066304664 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381412116127 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336722026155 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691912510932 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379113711989 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.