Not enough people realise the importance of natural world.
What is the reason for people's lack of awarness?
How can people be made more aware?
Some would argue that few people are aware of the significance of natural world. This essay will first argue that out of numerous excessive glamorization by the electronic media is a possible reason for the negligence, and then awareness can be cultivated by launching several programs at school level.
To embark with, electronic media has made the artificial world more attractable for people such as movies, dramas, and advertisements on the television depict that all rich and happy people spend time with their kith and kin in luxury hotels, amusement parks, and on other places. Therefore, it does not highlight the importance of any natural place or resource just for the sake of improving their business because, in return for on-airing these programs and commercials, they receive a hefty amount from owners. Owing to this, they contaminate people' minds to be a part of man-made world and utilize natural resources in a reckless manner. For example, recent advertisement of multi-story hotel buildings in Dubai shows that it has many opportunities for new investors and perfect destination for vacations with family to attract people and expand their business.
Nevertheless, the best possible method to burgeon the importance of the natural world among public is government should start awareness campaigns in schools to highlight the importance of natural resources. It could be made a part of their curriculum to teach pupils that natural world is in jeopardy and crucial steps must be taken to save environment for our upcoming generation. Therefore, it is more likely that what children learn at school will transfer this knowledge to their parents and siblings. For example, a similar initiative has been taken in Germany in 2017 and it begets benefits in terms of shifting attention of masses towards the concerns related to the world gifted by mother nature.
To conclude, media has been playing a pivotal role for years to neglect the natural world by too much romanticizing the artificial world; however, this problem could be addressed by teaching youngster about its importance.
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that companies should hire only male staff.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that upbringing of child is responsibility of a mother. Others say this responsibility lies with father.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- In some countries, younger people are neglecting their right to vote.What problems does this cause and what are some of the possible solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds being'.
Suggestion: minds being
... Owing to this, they contaminate people minds to be a part of man-made world and utilize na...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reckless manner" with adverb for "reckless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ade world and utilize natural resources in a reckless manner. For example, recent advertisement of m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28486646884 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83592291319 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587537091988 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6535921037 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.909090909 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6363636364 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370433815077 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137247886813 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070493484933 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205100630046 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669586366546 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.