The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph provides some information about the average emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) per person in four different countries during the period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is obvious that the carbon dioxide which was produced in italy and Portugal increased rapidly while the figures in united kingdom and Sweden went down over the 40-year period.
It can be seen from the line graph that the average emissions of carbon dioxide of Italy and Portugal showed the similar trend. From around one tonnes of carbon dioxide which was produced in Portugal in 1967, this figure increased rapidly to approximately 5.5 tonnes in 1997 and then went up slightly between 1997 and 2007. over the same period, there was a significant growth in the carbon dioxide <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">emissions</span> in Italy. It increased dramatically from more than 4 tonnes in 1967 to above 6 tonnes in 1977. By following two decades, this number went up steadily to about 7.5 tonnes and remained the same figure over the last 10-year period.
over the same period, the highest average emissions of carbon dioxide which was produced is in united kingdom. However, this number fell sharply to around 9 tonnes in 2007, although, it remained 11 tonnes from 1967 to 1997. By contrast, the figure for Sweden decreased sharply to roughly 7 tonnes in 1987 and fell steadily to about more than 5 tonnes in 2007, although, it reached a peak of 10.5 tonnes in 1977.
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one tonne', 'a tonne', or simply 'tonnes'?
Suggestion: one tonne; a tonne; tonnes
...l showed the similar trend. From around one tonnes of carbon dioxide which was produced in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...went up slightly between 1997 and 2007. over the same period, there was a significan...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...ure over the last 10-year period. over the same period, the highest average em...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04098360656 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08070256579 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467213114754 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0144415478 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340666651183 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15158577422 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119591680142 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23666383218 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690028239826 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.