It is disputable issue when people argue that teachers do not have any impact on their students. The modern educational system makes it less defined, but not less influential. I strongly believe that teachers have a profound impact on youngsters than friends because of their rich experience in specific topics, their background including qualifications and technical skills and last but not least, their personalities.
First, teachers usually have much extending experience in doing something such as conducting research if it is within university or they could have a practical experience in the past. For example, school teachers who influence young children and show them the diversity of the world nature, as usual have some experience in explaining the principles of the world construction or the common language rules. They also have life skills which are quite beneficial to be used during classes to show how something works in reality.
Second,teachers have an appropriate education to teach people. They have studied in the special universities and, moreover, have had a lot of practice to teach. For example, many specialists of teaching pass internships or apprenticeships to be eligeble to educate others. They should spend a lot of time to develop as professionals and those who can obtain necessary qualifications are able to teach. Only those who have knowledge in various specific topics can clearly expound the concept of the discipline.
Third,due to previous reasons, teachers finally acquire personal features which are closely related to their professional interests. They become empathetic and understand the needs and troubles of their students. Furthemore, teachers can feel what students need in order to be further members of the society certainly if teachers are kind and are capable to attract students to be interested in their subjects.
In conclusion, it is obvious that teachers are more important in influencing their students than friends of latter. Teachers have aa power to attract students' mind which is explained by their experience, theoretical and practical knowledge and their kind attitude to those who believe on them.
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 56
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increasedsteadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below showsthe development of the village Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of thevillage 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram shows how salt is removed from sea water to make it drinkable.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , teachers
...w something works in reality. Second,teachers have an appropriate education to teach ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , due
... the concept of the discipline. Third,due to previous reasons, teachers finally a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47181008902 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0141445267 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563798219585 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2679021365 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204999715356 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741137068498 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082831016467 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137425199574 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951089256375 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.