TPO 48 In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.
The lecturer challenges the topic proposed in the reading that several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations. And she thinks that none of these method would fix declining frog populations becaues each of them has problems.
First, the passage implies that laws prohibitting the farmers from using harmful pesticides would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs. However, the professor points out that laws prohibitting the farmers from using harmful pesticides would economically unfair. because if there are some farmers whose farmland is close to a significant frog populations, they would lose more crops and obtain a low yield under the restriction of using pesticides.
Second, the article supposes that antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat would protect frog populations from infection. But the lecturer supports that the treatments must be done individually for each frog to prevent infection, which is considerably difficult. Moreover, the prevention cannot passed to offsprings which means the treatments still have to be applied to their generation to prevent infection. Thus, this method is expensive and complicated.
Third, the essay mentions that if key water habitats were better protected from excessive water use and development, many frog species would recover. Nevertheless, the professor argues that this method cannot save frog populations because the biggest threaten of their habitats is not human activities and the real threaten is global warming. global warming causes many species go extinct so the method to protect water habitats caused by human activities cannot prevent habitats changes engerdered by global warming.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-20 | Shayooooon | 88 | view |
- TPO29 integrated 81
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts ar 85
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold, arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the Nort 3
- Soon technology will provide smart cars: cars that virtually drive themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and othertechnologies th 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'these methods'?
Suggestion: this method; these methods
...opulations. And she thinks that none of these method would fix declining frog populations be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...l pesticides would economically unfair. because if there are some farmers whose farmlan...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Global
...nd the real threaten is global warming. global warming causes many species go extinct ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70881226054 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82310228117 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.355784348 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.575854203534 0.272083759551 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193060590838 0.0996497079465 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967966303298 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304737470808 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029988739014 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.