The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The charts compare the sources of electricity in New Zealand and Germany in the years 1980 and 2010. Between these years, electricity generation almost doubled, rising from 127 units to 200 in new Zealand, and from 107 to 214 units in Germany.
In 1980 new Zealand used coal as the main electricity source (56 units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydropower (each producing 30 units) and petroleum (which produced only 11 units). By 2010, coal had become the fuel for more than 75% of electricity produced and only hydro continued to be another significant source supplying approximately 20%.
In contrast, Germany used coal as a source for only 28 units of electricity in 1980, which was matched by natural gas. The remaining 49 units were produced largely from petroleum and nuclear power, with hydro contributing only 7 units. But by 2010 nuclear power, which was not used at all in new Zealand, had developed into the main source, producing almost 75% of electricity, at 155 units, while coal and petroleum together produced only 55 units. Other sources were no longer significant.
Overall, it is clear by 2010 these two countries relied on different principal fuel sources: new Zealand relied on coal and Germany on nuclear power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Trang Carina | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 67 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. Whatcan governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. 89
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 84
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06698564593 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63829504014 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9378542669 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295832237657 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159363761411 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156993399784 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214705395159 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10911814482 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.